The four key issues forcing ‘unprecedented’ change for European fleets
Companies and businesses across Europe are facing unprecedented levels of change when it comes to fleet policies due to four key issues.
That was the message from Thibault Alleyn, global consulting director at FleetVision, the fleet and mobility consultancy arm of TÜV SÜD Group and sister company to Fleet Logistics, at an Asset Finance International event in London recently.
Speaking at the event, Alleyn told delegates that external factors – covering tax and legislation, the supplier offering, changes in doing business and employee mentality – meant that fleets could no longer stick to using the five-year old fleet policies commonly seen in practice a decade ago.
Looking at tax and legislation first, Alleyn said that a vast majority of European countries now linked carbon dioxide emissions to company car taxation which meant the total cost of ownership (TCO) need to be redefined to take this into account.
Fleet policies were being reviewed with a clear divergence between the car as a work tool and as a perk or benefit, with drivers actively pushing employers down their preferred route regarding Benefit-in-Kind, he said. This was especially true in Germany, UK, France, Italy and the Benelux, while Central and Eastern Europe and were catching up.
Addressing the supplier offering, Alleyn said that, in terms of the supplier landscape, there were rapidly changing pricing policies and much less commoditisation of the company car in favour of more bespoke electric and mobility packages.
Some leasing companies were offering clearly defined new pricing strategies, and differentials between companies in the market were increasing.
Fleet operators more than ever should seek to take benefit from this and look for long term partnerships based on solid processes and a broad offering. However, this was a challenge with alternative mobility providers, as most were new start-ups, he said.
Alleyn added that the way companies did businesses these days had changed the approach to their vehicle fleet with reduced expectation and need for physical travel. As a result, businesses travel less miles, with a smaller fleet for sales reps and support or technical staff.
The way business takes place has started to have an effect on work cars, and he cited as an example, consumer businesses that are more selective in visits to retail networks. Another factor was the trend towards repairing and maintaining products over the internet, while at the same time, pure perk or benefit cars were starting to drive lower mileages due to increased home working.
The fourth factor that was causing companies to rethink their fleet policies was the change in mentality amongst the newest generation of workers – so called ‘Generation X’.
There was a shift in mentality, especially in urban environments, towards car use and a growing divergence in employee expectations around cars in general, with the need for a car not always seen as essential.
This had a direct impact on benefit or perk fleets which clashed with harmonization objectives, and a lot of project time was spent on discussing and defining this balance with local Human Resources departments, added Alleyn.
He concluded: “No longer does one size fit all. All across Europe knowledge and agility have become key factors, with company cars chosen where there is a real need, cash when it is beneficial and the use of mobility measures where possible.
“The big change will come in terms of the mix of cars based on the powertrain and the segments they sit in, much more than major changes in volumes as such.
“Meanwhile, pilot mobility schemes are increasing exponentially, but they still have to prove whether they will convince a large part of employees to shift away from traditional company cars,” he said.
Companies that required further advice on setting car and mobility policies should talk with specialised consultancies, he advised, to ensure a broad and neutral perspective in supplier mix.