Knowledge gap a potential barrier for ULEVs, says Arval
Plug-in hybrids and electric vehicles could record higher take-up with fleets, but are being held back by not fitting conventional choice list criteria, according to Arval.
The company said the issues stem from traditional methods of compiling choice lists, based on whole-life costs, actual costs and CO2 output, and that vehicles which can spend at least some of the time using only electricity don’t fit these models.
Arval also said there’s a lack of knowledge about the different drivetrains on offer, particularly differentiating between conventional hybrids and plug-in hybrids, which potentially suit very different drivers, and that problems calculating business mileage for plug-ins remains an issue too.
David Watts, Fleet Consultant at Arval UK, said: “It may sound like quite a technical argument but a lot of fleets spend considerable periods of time working on their choice lists and deciding on which parameters they will use. These decisions have probably been rubber stamped by several internal departments such as human resources and finance.
“A vehicle that operates part of the time on electricity presents a basic problem when it comes to managing business mileage costs, particularly for those organisations that currently utilise fuel cards. We certainly know of organisations who haven’t yet adopted their first plug-in hybrids or EVs fundamentally because of the perceived problems associated with the choice list and business mileage issue.”
But, Watts said, it’s not an insurmountable problem: “Our consultancy team has been doing work in this area for several years and we have become very proficient at adding new drivetrain technologies to fleets while preserving the underlying principles of choice lists.
“Certainly, in our opinion, while there are stumbling blocks in this area, they should not stop you adding PHEVs and EVs to the options you present to drivers. They are legitimate, arguably even essential, parts of the fleet mix in 2016.”