Half of drivers think resident parking schemes inhibit commuter parking
The RAC research, carried out among 1,765 motorists, also asked whether commuters should be able to use spaces vacated by residents but found that 52% disagreed in contrast to one in five (20%) who are happy for this to take place.
Meanwhile six in 10 (61%) believe such schemes just shift the problem to another area while 49% say they discourage people from visiting an area for shopping and leisure purposes.
The RAC research also revealed a very common misapprehension around how local authorities use the money collected from the issuing of residents’ parking permits.
The vast majority (77%) wrongly believe the fees are simply another form of general local taxation and that little of the revenue is reinvested in road maintenance and development, with only 14% of those questioned thinking this was how the money was used. Asked how such income should be used, seven in 10 (70%) said they would like to see it spent on maintaining and developing roads.
Contrary to the views of those surveyed, a landmark high court judgement now prevents councils using parking charges as a way of raising revenue.
Despite this, an RAC Freedom of Information request has revealed that councils’ revenues from residents’ parking schemes range from a few thousand pounds a year to nearly £3m in the case of the London Borough of Lambeth, while others have also seen massive increases in the revenue collected in the last four years.
In London, the Borough of Haringey saw a 90% revenue rise from 2010-2011 to 2014-2015 from £1,029,240 to £1,958,319 having upped the number of schemes from 15 to 29 in that time period. Ealing was not far behind with an 84% increase from £938,988 to £1,730,063, from its 38 schemes.
Outside of London, Cambridgeshire County Council recorded an 80% rise in revenue from £254,328 to £458,387, while Carmarthenshire County Council in Wales brought in 70% more revenue – £31,820 to £53,935.
RAC spokesman Simon Williams said: “Parking is one of the most emotive motoring subjects, and residents’ parking is probably the most polarising subject of all depending, of course, on where you live.
“Residents without such schemes are often angered when they can’t park near their homes due to the influx of commuters, shoppers and leisure visitors, but many are also annoyed that they have to pay the council for the privilege of being able to park close to their own house or flat.
“Some commuters on the other hand find it difficult to understand why they shouldn’t be able to park in a residential street for the time they’re at work, knowing that they’ll be gone before most residents return home from work. What can also happen as more schemes are introduced is a domino effect where commuters end up trying to park in the next nearest location to their workplace, shifting the parking problem to another area.
“While people clearly have very different opinions of residents’ parking zones, local authorities need to take a common sense approach over their use and implementation.”